8th grade Amendment debates

PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT ON EARTH IS A "CHRISTIAN MOSQUE". IS THIS REALLY YOUR EVIDENCE? WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THIS INFORMATION FROM BECAUSE THIS LOOKS LIKE A LIE. SO DOES THAT MEAN ALL YOUR INFORMATION COULD BE FALSE!!

This is according to http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/22/ground-zero-mosque-religion-terrorism-opinions-columnists-conor-friedersdorf.html in case you where wondering.

So are you calling this sacred ground? First of all this is following the amendments not abusing it. And Saudi Arabia is based of an Islamic community. And this was never a law in america or in New York, so technically this is very legal. Also the developer of this project has legally bought the land and is free to do what ever he pleases with the land. And if this is really sacred ground why are there STRIP CLUBS RIGHT NEXT TO THE SIGHT AND THEY CALL IT THE "GROUND ZERO STRIP CLUB" WHEN STRIP CLUBS ARE CONSIDERED BAD IN AMERICA.

First of all Saudi Arabia have there own laws and Americans decided to make the amendment in favour of the people rights. And for the record Saudi Arabia is separate country that is based on religion and does not have the concept of freedom of religion.

According to http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/07/new.york.ground.zero.mosque/ this is a piece from the text itself "The center is being built by a private organization on land it legally owns. Twenty-nine out of 30 lower Manhattan community-board members voted to approve it. By every legal standard, the case for allowing Park51 to be built is, in the words of conservative UCLA constitutional-law professor Eugene Volokh, "open and shut."

If people get offended of the sight of 9/11 because it reminds them of the people that they lost they should not be living in that space if it is that traumatising for them.

If the contract is false it is no longer your fault. The authority should be handling these kinds of situations. You sign based on what is on the contract, it is your job to look more into the contract.

If it is not stated clearly on the contract it is not your responsibility to make sure that someone else's product is being manufactured properly. Having said that if it is illegal, the company/ suppliers should be held responsible.

If you have your name on something and you agree to that and later on find out that an issue such as this is happening then it is not the persons fault. It should now be the products fault because clearly the person with his/her name on aren't the ones supplying the product such as shoes etc... Having your name on a product does not make you guilty of any crime that the suppliers make because they are not hiring the people to make the product.