Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 21 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 85% |
Arguments: | 22 |
Debates: | 0 |
According to this article the police are not required to protect every individual citizen. Also this website shows that more lives are saved than taken away in self defense cases. We also do not know how many criminals import guns privatly. https://www.gunowners.org/fs9712.htm
Well in this article it shows the NRA accepting the right to bear arms. http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/
Well in this article http://www.wxyz.com/news/
So are you saying that it's a bad thing that there are guns already out on the street? Well because if that is true then you are saying that policemen should not have guns either. If they don't have guns no one can be protected from criminals, since importing guns is very easy to do and is very common. https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/
You don't have any evidence to support this statement. According to this article more people on average die of dog bites, falling and fires then gun shots. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/
Well now if some one is in danger in the middle of anywhere the police are not required to protect every individual citizen, but the majority which means that citizens need to have their own protection. https://www.gunowners.org/fs9712.htm
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |