In conclusion, safety always wins over privacy. You guys might say that they can get through them so they should switch it with a search dog or a metal detector, but if you want to do that be ready for horrible things to happen. This is because with a dog, it can only sniff drugs and with a metal detector it only detects metal so you can sneak plastic knives or drugs.

Is this an opinion because you have no sources which state that that is true.

It does not go against the 4th amendment because In 1973 the 9th Circuit Court rules on U.S. vs Davis, 482 F.2d 893, 908, there are key pieces of wording that give the TSA its power to search essentially any way they choose to. The key wording in this ruling includes “noting that airport screenings are considered to be administrative searches because they are conducted as part of a general regulatory scheme, where the essential administrative purpose is to prevent the carrying of weapons or explosives aboard aircraft.”

You have no evidence to prove that it doesn't show black on black.

Really, search dogs!!! If you are good enough you could hide a piece of meat and maybe that will get their attention. Search dogs are too easy to get through and metal detectors, there are plastic knives that can go through! Search Dogs would only be good for sniffing drugs but if you have a weapon you really think they can smell that!

Personal Freedoms the TSAs AIT does not impact personal freedoms, you guys agreed to buy the ticket which states that you are agreeing to go through these machines, if you dont want to do that take a boat!!!Relating back to the 4th amendment, it states that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no Warrants. TSA’s AIT is not an unreasonable search. its for safety. Also they don’t have a warrant but when you buy the ticket you are agreeing to go through security, which is where you are randomly chosen to go through the AIT. So TSA’s AIT is not unreasonable and you agree to it if you are planning to fly.

Im pretty sure the USA would have more problems if someone else can get through hijack a plane and bomb more of their buildings, once again there is no price for safety!!!

I can already tell you guys are losing because you are afraid to fight against our disputes, scaredy cats!!!

Where do you get your info, from 2008 because that is 2000 and late. All modern body scanners have been upgraded so they are tougher to get by. The background doesn't blend in with the weapon anymore.

Safety First!!! A human life is priceless, safety wins over privacy!!

They payed you for the image so they have right to do whatever they want with it; you don't know what they are going to do with it so then why would you do it, you should be responsible for the product.

A lot of customers buy the products because their favorite celebrities endorse for it and declare its effectiveness. If the product is not what it promises to be, the celebrities must be made liable for making false promises. If you signed the contract and it's a false contract then you should of looked into it because you are the one who signed it and you are partially responsible if your name is being used on the label!!

Well if you're letting your name be on the product or accept to be taken photos with it then you had the choice to support the product so you should be one of the names blamed. You or your agent should of looked into it before just accepting it for the money.

If you're being payed 10 million dollars just for your name on the label then you should look into it, you should actually see what the product is because you're the one agreed to have your name on it. You should be held all responsible because you're not the one who made it bad but it's your fault that you accepted 10 million dollars without even looking into it.