According to this article the police are not required to protect every individual citizen. Also this website shows that more lives are saved than taken away in self defense cases. We also do not know how many criminals import guns privatly. https://www.gunowners.org/fs9712.htm
Well in this article it shows the NRA accepting the right to bear arms. http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/
Well in this article http://www.wxyz.com/news/
So are you saying that it's a bad thing that there are guns already out on the street? Well because if that is true then you are saying that policemen should not have guns either. If they don't have guns no one can be protected from criminals, since importing guns is very easy to do and is very common. https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/
You don't have any evidence to support this statement. According to this article more people on average die of dog bites, falling and fires then gun shots. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/
Well now if some one is in danger in the middle of anywhere the police are not required to protect every individual citizen, but the majority which means that citizens need to have their own protection. https://www.gunowners.org/fs9712.htm
Men and women shouldn't be trained separately, because men and women are supposed to be treated as equals and if you separate them it shows that you are treating them as unequals. Also not all women are weaker than men, a lot of women are stronger than some men. They could also learn to work as 1 big military if they train together.