Claudiabl's Waterfall
Our closing sentence is; we believe that Americans should have the right to bear arms; Not just as a protection gear, but also as a well- being, you don’t know when someone is going to attack your home, or your family.
Also because of these three points;
Invasions from foreign countries are not an issue, because these countries know that many American citizens are well- armed.
The second amendment reduced the number of crimes due to the fact that everyone has the right to defend themselves.
Because of the second amendment people get the same right and advantage as criminals.
This amendment shouldn't be removed because it was created by the Constitution and “every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them.” The right to bear arms is a human right
As said before; Policemen cannot always protect everyone all the time, Americans with guns have the advantage that if they get attacked, and policemen is not there, or for whatever reason they cannot protect them, these people are able to protect themselves from invaders.
http://patriotwarrior.org/2008/03/18/
Exactly you just stated it; "Second Amendment was made for the sole purpose of preventing a tyrannical government from overtaking the people."
Meaning if they ban the guns then the government will become a tyranny because they are taking a constitution amendment off. Quote from George Washington; “When government takes away citizens’ right to bear arms it becomes citizens’ duty to take away government's right to govern.”
I already stated but I will stated again; The right to bear arms is Amendment 2, it was created by the Constitution in if the government takes it away, it will be the same thing as taking away Amendment 1, the freedom of speech, religion…
“Every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them.” The right to bear arms is a human right http://humanevents.com/2012/04/18/
“I began to accept that the gun itself posed no danger -- any danger was in the hand and heart of the beholder.” Said Tracy Scarpulla in CNN.news. “I learned I had nothing to fear and a lot to gain from owning a gun.”
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/02/
After the Sandy Hook shoot out parents started changing their minds; Robin and other parents who keep firearms in the home say the lesson of the Sandy Hook tragedy is not that we need more gun control but that we need more parental involvement in children's lives. http://edition.cnn.
A quote that George Washington said: “When government takes away citizens’ right to bear arms it becomes citizens’ duty to take away government's right to govern.”
So why would the government ban guns? When the government knows how important guns are to the safety of their citizens.
Another source that goes against your point; having a gun at home increases the chances of your family being safe;
A woman was saved by her family of gun owners — her husband and two sons — after a man attacked her in her Gonzales, Louisiana driveway and tried to kidnap her Sunday evening. “We all have rights as citizens, and I say stand up for them. Don’t back down from nobody if you are right.” http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/03/
If it wasn’t for the arms the family owned this women would have been kidnapped and would have been mistreated by the kidnapper who was in drugs during the accident.
But it comes from a news report, that makes it a pretty reliable source. http://edition.cnn.
My point was that policemen do more crimes involving guns and firearms, but we cannot just ban policemen from owning guns or other firearms. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/
Guns are a part of the Constitution, this is part of the culture and government of USA, so if the government removes Amendment Two, well why shouldn’t they remove other, as they have the right to remove one Amendment, they should also remove others.
The right to bear arms is Amendment 2, it was created by the Constitution in 1788 if the government takes it away, it will be the same thing as taking away Amendment 1, the freedom of speech, religion…
“Every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them.” The right to bear arms is a human right http://humanevents.com/2012/04/18/
We can't just remove the second amendment, and there is no media supporting those ideas you just listed.
Our third point is; Policemen are not always reliable, they take an average of 11 minutes to respond, so the citizen needs protection until the police comes. http://concealedguns.procon.org
Policemen cannot always protect everyone all the time, Americans with guns have the advantage that if they get attacked, and policemen is not there, or for whatever reason they cannot protect them, these people are able to protect themselves from invaders. “An armed man is a citizen. A disarmed man is a subject.” — Anon. “Having made it very difficult for States and localities to police themselves, having left ordinary citizens with no choice but to protect themselves as best they can, they now try to take our guns away. In fact they blame us and our guns for crime. This is so wrong that it cannot be an honest mistake.” — Malcolm Wallop, former U.S. Sen. (R-WY)
http://patriotwarrior.org/2008/03/18/
There are other options other than just banning guns from American citizens; There are more choices Americans can do to decrease the number of firearm deaths; at the bottom of this article there are a couple of ways Americans could change everything.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/
