Safety always beats privacy. Your argument was they go hand in hand, but they already do: the procedure for a full body scan is explained in this website http://travelsecure.infrastructure.gov.au/bodyscanners/faq.aspx#anc_i. You are wearing clothes the whole entire time, all you do is step into it and put your arms up. The images are not stored, and the photo that comes up is ghost-like, it is not pornographic, in some countries, the photo is a cartoon.

http://www.propublica.org/special/scanning-the-scanners-a-side-by-side-comparison

If they do not know that the products are made from child labor, then it's their fault for not looking into it, and researching about what they are giving their name to, before they do it.

"If you have your name on something and you agree to that and later on find out that an issue such as this is happening then it is not the persons fault." I do not agree because when you said that if they agree to give their name and then LATER find out an issue is happening, then it is still their fault, as they should have looked into it earlier, and researched what they were getting themselves into.

I strongly agree with your point. Celebrities are role models, they need to set good examples, and do things that they believe in, not just do things for money.

I think that celebrities should be responsible for the products they endorse because if they endorse the product, it makes it their responsibility. Plus, because they are good at what they do, they are role models to many. You don't want to be setting a bad example! Celebrities earn millions of dollars by endorsing brands, if someone is affected by misleading advertisements, celebrities. should be held responsible