Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 20 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 81% |
Arguments: | 30 |
Debates: | 0 |
These incidents occurred before these scanners were introduced.
Could you please clarify who James is? As he could be an un important person in this argument.
Closing Argument:
These Scanners have been found reliable in many cases and they aren't harming passengers, they are also easy and quick. So airports should still use these scanners and produce more.
Is your video reliable it was found for some guy on Youtube meaning this could have been made up.
So these scanners aren't only for the use of weapons but also illegal items
here is the source http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-information/
Pat downs are done by the same gender and passengers aren't required to life their skirts or take off clothing.
The TSA scanners are quick and will take no longer then 10 seconds but if passengers decide to go through pat downs it will take longer for them.
This argument states that TSA members should have better training not that TSA agents shouldn't use scanners.
Some passengers do not want to let anybody see them close to nudity, The TSA created an AIT scanner which produces millimeter waves which are harmless electromagnetic waves which produce a cartoon image of the passenger but still detects items on the body or in pockets.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |