Return to CreateDebate.comnocompromise • Join this debate community

8th grade Amendment debates


Sarahmadani's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Sarahmadani's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Therefore we think that the advanced imaging technology machines are not a good addition to our airports and we think that there should be a drug-melling dog and metal detectors at every check-in to keep safe and be 100% sure of our safety.

1 point

When you buy a ticket for a flight, it does not state on the ticket that you are excepting the fact that people will take nudes of you!! It is just wrong

1 point

Researchers from U.C. San Diego, University of Michigan, and Johns Hopkins University say that anyone with knowledge of the scanners can sneak a weapon through the scanners. This means that professional researchers believe that the scanners have no use as the weapons can be sneaked.

1 point

Even Benjamin Frankiln, a role model to many, agrees that “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” This means we should all follow these regulations and have metal detectors which give every human some privacy. The world already rips away a lot of privacy from humans already with the internet.

1 point

$150,000 for a piece of metal that is not 100% accurate. You could save lives in Africa instead of buying though's

1 point

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab commited something called the underwear bomber.Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab got through the airport with all the checks while having a bomb in his underwear. He went all the way through to the airplane but the bomb groin. This event happened on 2009 on Christmas Day. He was on a plane from Amsterdam to Detroit and it was degraded and caused a fire. This means they scanner is not accurate.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/491912/Underwear-bomb-plot-failed-because-bomber-wore-pants-for-two-weeks

1 point

Yes, you might say that it does not affect a person tremendously, but if they carry on with extreme checks like this this will start to carry on to these kinds of checks everywhere. This will create delay of a regular persons day.

1 point

There is plastic (1.5 cm) that can cover weapons and drugs and mask them from the scanner. This proves that in fact, this scanner doesn’t stop all terrorists and drug dealers from continuing their illegal acts.

A passenger can tape a gun to there leg (the outside of it), right above there knee. That means that the black that shows up from the gun blends in with its background.

1 point

They need to change all body scanners with machines such as metal detectors that have no radiation

1 point

Many passangers flying in America are MUslims and Christians and the act to look under a persons clothes is against there religions stated in these verses in the bible and the Quran.

1 Timothy 2:9 - In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

O children of Adam, We have bestowed upon you clothing to conceal your private parts and as adornment. But the clothing of righteousness - that is best. That is from the signs of Allah that perhaps they will remember. [Quran 7:26]

1 point

yes this is a valid point but safety is as important as liberty so to make all passengers happy they should create a system such as dog searches and metal detectors to replace the personally invasive machines

1 point

They show the outlines of the humans gentals- http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Full-Body%20Scanners

This makes the traveler uncomfortable

0 points

The people deserve the right to know who is behind the screen looking at your "nudes". These people might be perverts that have nothing to do with wanting to find weapons, just to see somebodies naked bodies.

0 points

The machines will just cause economic problems in America as each body scanner costs over $150,000. It will create a problem as they will run out of money to use for valuable things.

0 points

As you state that safety is an important factor, although liberty and safety should come hand in hand. They should replace the Advanced Imaging Technology with a less invasive searches such as metal detectors along with search dog.

0 points

What is your source saying that NO pilots have cancer? This is not true, 36.9% of people have cancer. seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html

-1 points

I believe that the TSA Advanced Imaging Technology, also known as the full body scanner should not be used in America. There are many reasons for this but one of the main concerns of passengers trying to travel with ease is too much invasion of there naked body.

-1 points

In the modern era people are continuously having their privacy invaded everyday using advanced imaging technology. Today we will be talking about risks and effects of using this Full Body Scanner. The opposition might say that safety is more important than liberty although they should go hand in hand. We are going to try and argue that even though giving up a simple freedom like this will lead to giving up major freedoms later on.

1 point

I strongly agree that a celebrity should only be producing and designing products that they believe in, otherwise there will be a side of fakeness and lies along with the product that is wrong.

2 points

They should be held responsible for there own products. They should never blame someone for your own decision. They should take advantage of being a celebrity and speak up about there own decisions. As millions of people look up to these famous peoples life's and choices, if they make a dumb and unfair decision, people from around the world will start to be irresponsible about there choices and never own up to it.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]